Book Review: “One Night in Bridgeport”, by Mark Paxson

One Night in BridgeportOne Night in Bridgeport is a legal thriller that follows Jack McGee, a law student who is sent to Bridgeport, California to deliver some papers concerning the purchase of some land by a large corporation. While there, he decides to have a one-night stand with a local woman, Lea Rogers. (Who, though McGee doesn’t realize it at the time, is the daughter of the property owner.)

The next morning, McGee wakes up feeling overwhelmed with guilt and regret over cheating on his fianceé and leaves without speaking to the still-sleeping Rogers. She wakes up in time to see McGee’s car pulling out of the parking lot, and immediately feels angered and hurt by his caddish behavior.

Later, she discovers that McGee is handling the purchase of her mother’s property, and her anger only increases further. In a conversation with her friend and local lawyer, Butkus Sweet, she mentions sleeping with McGee and Sweet decides that it must have been rape. After he pressures her to do so, Rogers presses charges against McGee.

From this point, things go from bad to worse for McGee, beginning with his initial decision to tell the investigators he has never met Rogers, and continuing through his trial, where many other questionable aspects of his past come to light.

The book has an almost Rashomon-like quality to it, in that we see things from different characters’ points-of-view. In addition to McGee, Paxson also shows the perspectives of Rogers, Sweet, and the Judge. (Personally, I found the Judge and McGee’s determined-but-overworked defense attorney, Tammy,  to be the most sympathetic characters in the story.)

The plot is well-paced, and the final twist that resolves the story is both set up well enough that it doesn’t feel like it came out of nowhere, but hidden well enough that you don’t see it coming. I also enjoyed the descriptions of McGee’s walks in the snow. At one point, Paxson alludes to the eerie, muffled silence that accompanies a new snowfall–I loved that, because to me it’s one of the most interesting things about snow, and not enough writers make mention of it.

My only real problem with the book was how unlikable McGee is, but I suspect that this is a pretty realistic depiction of this kind of case. Some readers might be alienated by his personality, but if you’re the type who needs someone to root for to feel engaged with a story, be patient–in the second half of the book, the Judge emerges as a very well-written, sympathetic and interesting character.

It’s the sort of book that I think can be perceived very differently by different readers, so before you read my last bit of analysis, I recommend you read it yourself and make up your own mind. I’m not only going to spoil some plot points below, but also say some subjective stuff that could color your perception of the characters. So, now’s your chance to bail if you don’t want spoilers.


In addition to acting as the prosecutor, Butkus Sweet becomes Lea Rogers lover over the course of the case. He’s been interested in her for a long time, despite her being only 22 to his 31–long enough that it feels just a bit unwholesome.

During their various trysts, Sweet repeatedly tells Rogers that McGee raped her, even as she hesitates and asks him to drop the case. At a certain point, he becomes so forceful in how he overrules her own feelings on the matter that it seems almost like he is, in a sense, violating her–not physically, but mentally. He is effectively asserting “I know what happened to you! I know what’s best! You don’t know your own mind.”

Sweet isn’t portrayed as a flat-out villain, and he really does seem to care about Rogers in his way, but at the same time, he seems to have the very disregard for a woman’s words that he repeatedly accuses McGee of having during the trial. I thought this was a very interesting parallel between the two characters.

All in all, One Night in Bridgeport is a strong effort that gives the reader something to think about afterward, as well as an engaging story.


  1. This is one of the first indie books I read, and I loved it. I thought Paxson captured the nuances well. It wasn’t all black and white. I’m eagerly awaiting his next legal thriller, or whatever else he has up his sleeve.

    1. It was a really good read–and I have you to thank for introducing me to Paxson’s work!

What's your stake in this, cowboy?