All Fiction is Experimental

Maybe you’ve heard the term “experimental fiction”. It’s usually used to mean some form of fiction that is very unusual in form, as opposed to “literary” or “genre” fiction. Experimental fiction typically means fiction that breaks all the established rules of literature.

As with everything, breaking the rules often means you crash and burn. The rules are there for a reason. But once in a while, it leads to great discoveries and innovations that alter the entire field.

I’ll be honest: I have never much liked these divisions of “literary” and “genre” and “experimental” fiction. To me, there are only two kinds of books — good ones and bad ones.

The truth is, all fiction is an experiment. The writer puts together the tale as best he or she can, and then there is a process — similar to a chemical reaction —  that determines how it plays in the readers’ minds. Every reader brings their own experience and perspective to a book, and there’s no knowing what their perception of it will be.

Now it’s true, there are certain types of stories that each individual will tend to like or dislike. I like sci-fi and horror in general, and am usually not much for fantasy or murder mysteries. But there are always exceptions. There are horror stories I hate and murder mysteries I love.

Every writer, regardless of whether they are classified as literary, experimental, or in some genre or other, is writing because they feel they have something to say that no one else can. Maybe there are those who write so-called “potboilers” and are just in it for the money, but even they have to try to bring something at least somewhat new to the table — otherwise their work won’t sell.

But it’s always an experiment, even for the most famous authors. I could name works by my favorite authors that I don’t think are very good, and one-hit wonders by authors who never again wrote anything I liked.


  1. It all goes back to what I’ve said before … there are no rules, just write a good story. Of course, that sounds so incredibly easy. If only it were so.

    1. Yep. It’s “simple, but not easy”, as the saying goes.

      BTW, I’m really enjoying “One Night in Bridgeport” so far.

  2. What I always find interesting is that a good book to one person is an awful book to another. We all like what we like, I guess. Even bestsellers have reviews that are all over the place. But it’s nice there are so many kinds of books out there. Something for everyone.

    1. Quite true. Even among fans of the same genre or author there can be lots of different opinions–I know Stephen King fans whose opinions of specific King books vary wildly.

What's your stake in this, cowboy?