There’s a famous Twilight Zone episode about a man who loves to read, and who, upon finding himself the only survivor of a nuclear war, begins gathering all the books from the ruins of the library, eager to spend the remainder of his life reading without interruption. Then he falls and his glasses break, and he finds himself with plenty of time to read, but unable to do so.
It’s dark, it’s ironic, and it evokes Cold War fears of annihilation, so small wonder it’s practically the quintessential Twilight Zone episode.
But here’s an even darker proposition for you: what if we forget that we can read?
I don’t mean forgetting the basic act of reading written symbols and associating them with meanings; we can still do that. No, I’m talking about something more insidious than that.
I used to say I didn’t read as much as I wanted to because I didn’t have time. But then I thought about it, and I realized that wasn’t completely true. What about the time I spend watching TV? Or playing video games? Or—and this was by far the biggest time-sink—mindlessly scrolling through the internet, watching videos or looking at the latest news.
I decided to make a conscious effort to spend that time reading instead. And I mean seriously reading, as in focusing on a novel and getting absorbed in it, not the “reading-lite” that is skimming social media or most websites.
It’s important to remember that, not that long ago in generational terms, reading was one of our best forms of entertainment. As recently as the early 1900s, there was no TV. Netflix and Xbox and Twitter were unfathomable. The only remotely comparable entertainment was the theater, and that was largely for the upper-class. For most people, entertainment was reading, telling stories, and maybe playing some music.
I read that, when he was a boy, Isaac Asimov would loaf around reading pulp science fiction novels, which he justified to his disapproving father by saying that they had the word “science” in the name. This tells you a lot about how the world has changed—nowadays a parent would probably be thrilled if their child, especially their son, was reading anything.
It’s well-known that reading is very different than watching television in that it involves imagination to a greater extent. The less serious reading you do, the more your skills at translating written words into complex thoughts will begin to atrophy.
Put simply, reading is harder than watching TV or surfing the web. (I’m less sure about how it stacks up vs. gaming, but at the very least it seems safe to say it engages different parts of the brain.) It requires an active effort to put the mind in serious reading mode, although once you do it’s also much more rewarding. There is an obvious analogy with exercise here: it takes more of an effort to lift weights or go jogging than to sit on the couch doing nothing, but you feel better afterward.
I’m not saying that television or movies or scrolling through your timeline are inherently bad, by the way. What I’m saying is, these are the things we gravitate toward doing automatically, unless we make an effort to check ourselves. Until recently, I never consciously thought, Would I rather look at the trending hashtags right now or read a novel? The hashtag thing came easier, and so that was just what I naturally did without stopping to wonder if there could be a better use of my time.
It took consciously reminding myself I could be reading right now to change this. I’m still very much a work in progress in this regard; I skim the political news more than I probably should. But at least I’m now in the habit of considering the fact that there is a trade-off.
When I tell people I write books, they often shrug and say, “Nobody reads anymore.” While obviously an exaggeration, the underlying point is true: most people are spending their leisure time watching YouTube or Netflix or looking at Instagram, not reading novels.
I’m not here to judge anyone else for what they’re doing. But as the proverb says, “Physician, heal thyself.” So I’m trying to make sure that I, at least, frequently ask whether what I’m currently doing is more valuable than reading. After all, if we learn nothing else from the Twilight Zone, it’s that just having the time isn’t enough—you also need to be able to use it effectively.
As you note, the ease of everything on the internet provides the greatest of distractions from things that are more intrinsically good for us. As I’ve said repeatedly in recent years while struggling with writer’s block, the reality is that when I come home after work, I don’t have the energy do do anything but something that is easy. And that has developed into a habit that intrudes on other times of the day and week when the “lack of energy” is not a valid excuse. Gotta break that habit.
Time to go read and get off this darn thing. 😉
That’s the spirit! 🙂
It’s ironic that just when there are more writers publishing, thanks to technology, so many potential readers are using technology for other forms of entertainment. One of those cosmic jokes. But here you’ve written this well-reasoned post and several people have read it and it’s made some of us think.
Thanks very much, Audrey! 🙂
That strikes at my heart. Except for the games (I don’t understand games), I’m guilty of all the rest. It should be a simple formulae if I wish to write I should also read.
(In defence my audio book collection is quite large)
Audiobooks are great! I listened to a lot of classics on audiobook. The only trouble is, so few indie books are in audiobook form, and I do love indie books…
Very true. I guess the costs kill that line of publication, because you do need a good professional narrator. A good narrator can make a book soar.
For example: The ‘Black Ocean’ & ‘Mercy for Hire’ SF series of books by J S Morin are quite entertaining and intelligent, yet not what you would call ‘classics’. However when Mikael Naramore’s his voice skills bring every character to life (and there are a legion of them) listening is a joy, you are really there with the personalities.
I have my sets on Audible (owned by Amazon- what isn’t?) and will be listening to them against soon (all 132 hours worth!)
Oh, yes! A good narrator can make a huge difference.
Definitely an art.
Mea Culpa, I too watch too much TV. My problem is that when I get to reading I tend to skip writing.
I think we all suffer from both issues! 🙂
Very thoughtful essay. I do find myself engaging in games when I could be reading. Some of it is productive like Duolingo which I use to practice my poor Spanish language skills. Sometimes my brain just wants to shut down, just do a jigsaw puzzle or word game. I’m grateful for audiobooks so I can multitask, but reading a paper-and-ink book (or magazine or journal) is a pleasure that I don’t take for granted. By the way, that Twilight Zone episode is my favorite and also my most frightening. While I enjoy audiobooks, I hope I never lose my vision and ability to read.
Audiobooks are indeed awesome. But yes, just not quite the same. Thanks for the comment! 🙂