The spam comments are developing rudimentary intelligence.

And they’re not friendly:

you should explaine to me you actually could not merely start using a wikipedia web-site to prove a point……

That was on this post. Admittedly, that post doesn’t quote Wikipedia, but I have quite a few posts that do.  So there is some context in which this could possibly make sense.  And it’s even written in something resembling correct English.  It certainly would pass muster among the lowest rung of non-spam YouTube comments.

I, for one, do not welcome our new spam comment overlords.

2 Comments

  1. Dang, says I have to sign into WordPress. I’m sure it’s good, though, although my spammers have been rather boring of late. One spammer would like me to help him with his bloog. Sigh…

    Like

What's your stake in this, cowboy?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s