Book Review: “The Dream Master” by Roger Zelazny (1966)

“Like deep-burrowing, mythological worms, power lines, pipelines and pneumatic tubes stretch themselves across the continent. Pulsing, peristalsis-like they drink of the Earth and the thunderbolt. They take oil and electricity and water and coal-wash and small parcels and large packages and letters into themselves. Passing through them, underneath the Earth, these things are excreted at the proper destinations, and the machines who work in these places take over from there.

Blind, they sprawl far away from the sun, without taste, the Earth and the thunderbolts go undigested; without smell or hearing, the Earth is their rock-filled prison. They only know what they touch, and touching is their constant function.

Such is the deep-buried joy of the worm.” –-Roger Zelazny, The Dream Master

Every now and again, in the bookish circles of Twitter, I’ll see this tweet referenced:

This is an exaggeration for comic effect, but sometimes it is true. It is especially true with a book like The Dream Master, which I picked up after enjoying Zelazny’s A Night in the Lonesome October.

This book is absolutely nuts. There is a plot, to a degree, involving a man who helps shape and understand people’s dreams by means of a simulation machine. But that part of the story is only loosely threaded through bizarre and surreal images like that in the passage quoted above. I already forget, if indeed I ever knew, what that has to do with the story proper. But when you write something that good, it hardly matters.

It took me a while to figure out, but the book is actually structured like a dream. You know how dreams are: you’ll be at the office Christmas party, only your boss doesn’t look like your boss, and then suddenly you’re trying to break into a haunted house with the aid of Mitt Romney. It all makes sense when you’re dreaming it, and sounds insane when you remember it later. (And yes, I have had this exact dream.)

This book is like that; full of symbolism and weird changes of voice and perspective that call to mind simultaneously The Waste Land, the works of C.S. Lewis, and the more esoteric elements of the Dune universe. It is, in other words, a complete fever-dream acid-trip of a book.

Which is not to suggest that it is bad! Not at all. Indeed, I often think the best books, or at least the most memorable ones, are those that make you feel like you are teetering on the edge of madness. What fun is a book that merely describes the humdrum and everyday? If we accept the description of reading quoted above, then by golly, when I stare at my tree-slices and hallucinate, I want it to be something extraordinary.

And throughout The Dream Master, there are fragments like that; haunting, prescient, visionary glimpses into concepts that seem less dream-like now than they must have in 1966. Why, why is it, I ask you, that so many of these sci-fi dystopias of past literature seem to feel so uncomfortably close to our present-day reality? I am again reminded of Clarke’s Childhood’s End, and the idea that the appearance of the aliens in ancient human folklore meant that they “became identified with [humanity’s] death. Yes, even while it was ten thousand years in the future! It was as if a distorted echo had reverberated round the closed circle of time, from the future to the past.”

The idea of the future coming back to haunt us in the past–now there’s an idea that would be not at all out of place in Zelazny’s nightmare-world! No, no; this book, despite being in many ways exceptionally strange, is also endlessly fascinating, deeply unsettling and even, in some places, rather funny. I recommend it; just don’t go in expecting a linear narrative.

13 Comments

  1. Way back, I read Zelazny’s Amber series and enjoyed it a lot. I can’t remember it very well at this point, but I know it had a relationship to Irish mythology, Unfortunately, I’m pretty much a realist partial to “liniear narratives.” If I have to work too hard to figure out what the writer is talking about, I get frustrated. Myth, I love, but I prefer to leave densely written lyricism to the realm of poetry.

    1. This one really walks the line to the point where parts really do feel almost like poetry.

  2. Zelazny, arguably could be one of the more challenging SF writers. He mixed SF concepts with lores and styles from various cultures. Sometimes including earlier conventions of SF writing- like pulp in ‘The Doors of His Mouth, the Lamps of His Mouth’.
    ‘The Dream Master’ goes into layers and layers. Similar to ‘Roadmarks’
    Time to go back to my youth and revisit what I couldn’t grasp then.
    Thanks for the nudge

  3. I won’t be reading this one, but it did remind me of the fact that I have read Zelazny in the distant past. I just can’t remember /what/ I read. I may have to go look at a booklist and see if anything jumps out at me.

  4. Like TermiteWriter I read and enjoyed the Amber series, though I tried rereading Nine Princes in Amber at some point in the last few years, and it failed to engage me like it did when I was in my teens/twenties. Tastes change, I find that most of the old SF is too sparsely written form my current tastes. I have several other books of his on my shelves, but none stand out.

      1. It has an alternate world premise, and traveling through all the “shadows worlds” has that dream-like feeling you enjoyed in this book , with an actual plot as a bonus.

  5. I also read the Amber series way back when, over 30 years ago in my ‘BC’ (before children) era, and remember enjoying it. Haven’t read anything else by Zelazny but have the Illustrated Roger Zelazny though haven’t read that recently so can’t remember if I like it or not.
    I probably won’t have the patience for this particular one but I do like the paragraphs you quoted at the beginning. And thanks for mentioning A Night in the Lonesome October as I’d forgotten I want to read it! 😂

    1. I think you will definitely enjoy “A Night in the Lonesome October”. It’s very different than “Dream Master,” so much so that I would hardly have guessed they were by the same author. He was quite versatile.

What's your stake in this, cowboy?