Here we observe one of the dangers of academic tenure…
The short version, if you don’t have time to watch the video, is like this: evidently having nothing better to do, Roberto Unger, a former professor of President Obama’s, has concluded that same President Obama must be defeated. This defeat will, so he says, “allow the voice of democratic prophecy to speak once again in American life.”
Obviously, the good professor knows this will not happen under President Romney. But the defeat of Obama is necessary to allow for true progressivism to return, he believes.
Let us look at history, shall we? From 1968 until 1992, the Republicans won every Presidential election but one. The Democrats finally got Clinton in ’92, but this was largely through the “New Democrat” strategy of adopting many laissez-faire Republican economic policies. In other words, the Democrats accomplished their victory only by becoming much more like the Republicans on economic issues. Not exactly what Prof. Unger is looking for.
Cast back a bit further, and we find the shoe on the other foot: From 1932 until 1952, the Republicans did not win a Presidential election. When they finally did win, it was with Dwight Eisenhower, a war hero and a man so friendly to the New Deal that Republican extremists suspected him of communism. Clearly, the Republicans had to capitulate a good deal to the Democrats on economic policy.
In recent times, there are two instances where a party lost an election and four years later returned with a more extreme candidate: 1964 and 1980. Goldwater was more extreme than Nixon, and he was crushed. Reagan was more extreme than Ford, and he won handily. So, it’s kind of a mixed bag. (Not, of course, if you factor in charisma; then it is all quite explicable.)
The record is pretty clear: parties rarely favor their more radical economic policies in the wake of sound defeats. They do just the opposite, trying to emulate and subsume elements of the winning party’s policies. This is especially true for Democrats. I therefore judge Prof. Unger’s plan a bad one.
(Video via Huffington Post. Also check out this post about Prof. Unger at The Reaction.)
That was Nadir’s and the Green Party’s reasoning in 2000. How well did that turn out?
He isn’t running this year, is he? Please tell me he isn’t running this year… I know he placed third in 2008, I hope that doesn’t encourage him.
In all seriousness, he has some interesting ideas, but the guy seems to have no grasp of strategy.